Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption

Copyright & Permissions

Copyright in Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption articles

Information about the copyright licence for Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption (JCA) articles is provided below.

Should you wish to make use of an JCA article in a way not permitted by the appropriate licence, please contact the journal team at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Inclusion of previously published material in your Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption article

Authors preparing their articles for submission to the journal may wish to include material (such as figures and tables) from the previously published work of other authors.

Submitting authors are responsible for declaring to the journal team upon submission that an article contains reproduced content.

Before publication of any article reproducing previously published content, submitting authors will need to seek approval from the author and any publisher of that work.

The permission request form may be adapted for this purpose.

The journal team will take reasonable steps to identify any reproduced material that has not been declared.

Copyright in Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology articles

Information about the copyright licence for Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ANSN) articles is provided below.

Should you wish to make use of an ANSN article in a way not permitted by the appropriate licence, please contact the journal team at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Instructions to Authors

Online Submissions

The information outlined below describes how to prepare your manuscripts for submission to the journal. We suggest you to read this in full before submitting your article.

Please follow these minimum standards while preparing the manuscript for peer-reviewing.

  • Submitted papers should be in Vietnamese or English Language
  • The manuscript should be submitted as an MS Word Document
  • Ensure the Manuscript adheres to the journal guidelines
  • All papers are subjected to scientific peer review.
  • All papers must be submitted via email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Preparation of Manuscript

All original research articles should be structured in the following manner.


The title should be concise and reflect the entire work of the submitted manuscript.


Below the title, all author names should be mentioned along with Affiliation of each author. Affiliation details should include

  • Department, University or Organization, City, State and Country for all authors.
  • Each author affiliation should be identified by a superscript small numeral.
  • Author for correspondence should be indicated by an asterisk.


  • Abstracts should not exceed more than 150 words and should not contain literature references. An abstract may not be necessary for short communications. The symbols, abbreviations, units, and nomenclature used in the text should be in conformity with the recommendations of IUPAC.
  • Abstracts need not be in a structured format.
  • It should clearly state the purpose of the work, methods used, key findings and major conclusion drawn from the work
  • Use of abbreviations in the abstract should be avoided however if essential should be expanded at its first appearance.


  • The author should provide 3 to 5 keywords, characterizing the scope of the paper
  • Keywords should be written in title case and separated by a comma.
  • Avoid general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, 'and', 'of').


Authors to number the article headings in Arabic style format.

  • Headings should follow title case, meaning that all words except for prepositions, articles, and conjunctions should be capitalized.
  • All botanical names should be in italics.

For example:     1. Finite Element Modelling (FEM)
                          1.1 Model Description


State the background and mention clearly the objective of the present work, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.

All the texts should be in Segoe UI Light 10 point, single line spacing, before spacing 0pt, after spacing 6pt. Papers in A4 size (29.7x21.0 cm) should be used. Margins of text are recommended as follows. Top and bottom margins are 2.5 cm, right and left margins are 2.0 cm. When starting a new section, one line space should be used.


  • All materials and methods used should be clearly mentioned to allow other researchers to reproduce your work.
  • Wherever required, give correct formula used for calculation of the results.

Results and discussion

  • Results obtained in the study should be subjected to appropriate statistical methods and presented clearly.
  • It should comprise of rationale and relevance of the present study along with the existing literature.
  • Discuss the lacuna in the area and to how much extent the present study answered the research question and give future directions for further research.


  • Give the major conclusion from the present study.
  • This section may stand alone or be clubbed together with discussion.


Acknowledge all those people who have helped during the work by providing facilities, personal assistance and funding if any.


Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa).

Author(s) name(s), journal title/book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter and the pagination must be present. Examples:

  1. M. Inoue, H. Kominami, T. Inui, Appl. Catal. A 121 (1995) 143-148
  2.       M.V. Sargent, F.M. Dean, in: A.R. Katrizky, C.W. Rees (Eds.), Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977, p. 599.
  3.       J. Ciric, US Patent 3 972 983 (1976), to Mobil Oil Corporation.


new Download Article Template (paper written in Vietnamese)

new Download Article Template (paper written in English)

Journal Policies and Ethics


I Access Policy

Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption (JCA) is under paywall/Subscription. Readers who wish to access the full text should subscribe to the journal or can purchase individual article.

II Peer-review Policy

All the manuscripts submitted to Vietnam Journal of Catalysis and Adsorption will be subjected to double blind peer review process;

  • The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in respective subject area.
  • The reports of both the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
  • Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on reviewer's comments.
  • Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
  • Associate editor and review editors provide the administrative support to maintain the integrity of peer review process.
  • In case, authors challenge editor's negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.

III Licensing Policy

Authors will transfer copyright to the publisher as part of the journal publishing agreement. However the authors will retain the right to:

  • Retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
  • Proper attribution and credit for the published work.

IV Archiving Policy

  • Authors sign the copy right transfer statement and still retain their rights to self-archive the articles.
  • The accepted manuscript may be archived on the author's website.
  • Authors can deposit in any repository their works, but it should not be the final version as available with the publisher.
  • Author can post his/her version provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication with a link to the published article, it has to be the DOI number link. The Final published article is available at Informatics Journals (URL:....)


JCA is an electronic Double Blind peer reviewed journal upholding the highest standards. Articles not in accordance with publication ethics and malpractices will be removed from publication if detected at any time. Plagiarism and research fabrication such as making up of data, manipulation of existing data, tables etc. and ethical clearance on the use of humans or animals for the study will also be checked. The journal reserves the right to use plagiarism detecting software to screen submitted papers at any time and suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing will be reported immediately.

I Authors Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • Their work is original
  • Must not have been published elsewhere
  • Other authors, contributors or sources should be appropriately credited
  • They are responsible for language editing before submission
  • Their work has not been copied or plagiarized in whole or part from any other work
  • The financial support and conflict of interest for the project / research work if any should be disclosed
  • They are obliged to notify the editor if any error or inaccuracy is discovered and co-operate with the editor to correct the same

Articles should be submitted using online procedures. Simultaneous publication in more than one publication is a breach of publication ethics.

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) during the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity in Singapore in 2010 has developed the below mentioned guidelines. Informatics Journals, as a publisher follows COPE, WAME and has adopted COPE’s best practice guidelines for dealing with ethical issues in a journal. The Journal Members (Advisory Board, editors and the journal manager) have consented to adopt the COPE as it meets the purpose and objective of the Journal.

The following is a summary of COPE's international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and describes responsible research reporting practice. The comprehensive guidelines can be downloaded here

  • The research being reported should have been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and should comply with all relevant legislation.
  • Researchers should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.
  • Researchers should strive to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.
  • Researchers should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarised, and has not been published elsewhere.
  • Authors should take collective responsibility for submitted and published work.
  • The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals' contributions to the work and its reporting.
  • Funding sources and relevant conflicts of interest should be disclosed.

II Editor's Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • The submitted manuscript undergoes Double - blind peer review before publishing
  • They will strive to prevent any conflict of interest between the author and editorial and review personnel
  • All the information related to the submitted manuscript is kept confidential prior to publishing

III Reviewers Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • Reviews of the manuscript is completed and provides suitable comments for improvement
  • Promptness in notifying the editor about his inability to review the manuscript
  • Maintains confidentiality about the manuscript obtained for review, by not discussing with others
  • Standards of objectivity preserved by reviewing the manuscripts objectively with clear views and supporting arguments and without any personal criticism
  • Acknowledgement of Sources
  • All References not cited by author should be removed. All citations should be accompanied with any previously reported observation, derivation or argument.
  • The editors should be intimated for any overlap of the reviewed manuscript with any other published paper.
  • Disclosures and Conflict of Interest– manuscripts having conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or any other relationships or connections with institutions connected to the paper will not be considered.

In case, plagiarism is detected during review/editorial process, such manuscript(s) will be rejected immediately and we can also consider other steps depending upon the seriousness of the case. If the plagiarism is proven after publication, such manuscript(s) will be removed from our website and appropriate announcement will be placed in this regards.

Further, JCA can bring such instances in notice of author's funding agencies, author's institutes (where they work) and to the original authors whose work has been plagiarized. Please report the plagiarism to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

IV Copyright policies

All the articles published in JCA are held by the Publisher.

Informatics Journals, as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication.

This will permit Informatics Journals to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article. Self-Archiving rights will still be retained by the author.

V Disclaimer

The author(s) of each article appearing in this Journal is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; neither the JCA nor its editors or publisher or anyone else involved in creating, producing or distribution assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information provided in the Journal, nor shall they be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages arising out of the use of JCA.

VI Plagiarism:

For every Journal, the peer review process is at the heart of the success of publishing. As part of our commitment to the protection and enhancement of the peer review process, the JCA would like to ensure that all published articles are within the accepted level of plagiarism. The Journal uses the very well and widely accepted Plagiarism Detection tool, iThenticate. All submitted Manuscripts are first subjected to Plagiarism check and then the Publishing cycle begins.

In case, plagiarism is detected during review/editorial process, such manuscript(s) will be rejected immediately and we can also consider other steps depending upon the seriousness of the case. If the plagiarism is proven after publication, such manuscript(s) will be removed from our website and appropriate announcement will be placed in this regards. Further, "JCA" can bring such instances in notice of author's funding agencies, author's institutes (where they work) and to the original authors whose work has been plagiarized. Please report the plagiarism to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

VII Corrections and Retraction Policy

Article Withdrawal

Either the Publisher or the author of the article can withdraw the same. An article can be withdrawn at any point in time before it is formally published online in its final form with complete information about volume, issue, page numbers, DOI and article ID. If the article withdrawal request has been initiated by an author, they need to submit a signed letter to the Editorial Office prior to article withdrawal. Publisher can withdraw an article if it is found to violate the ethical publishing guidelines, like Duplicate publication, Plagiarism, Fraudulent usage of data, Multiple Submissions, Bogus claims of authorship. In both the cases, the article PDF will be removed and a note that the article has been withdrawn will be displayed

Corrections to an Article

If an error is discovered in an already published article, Erratum, Corrigendum or Addendum will be published in an issue once the proposed changes are in agreement with Publisher and Author. Only significant corrections will be published such as – Inaccurately published information etc. Minor corrections like spelling mistakes or grammatical errors which do not alter the understanding of the paper will not be corrected. When a correction is published, the original article reference will be given in the corrected PDF and vice-versa. Only the corrections will be mentioned. Charges will be decided while corrections are made depending on the number of corrections etc.

Original article will not be modified, but correction link will be available on the article page. This will help readers to download both the PDFs.

An Errata will be published only when mistakes are recognized in the published article which went unnoticed during Editing and Layout setting in Figures, Tables etc.

Corrigenda is published when authors realise that errors in the published article could affect the validity of the scientific content, or its accuracy. If a reader detects an error in a published article, they can submit the same as a letter to the editor. The author, editor and a reviewer would then assess the validity of the error pointed out. Corrigenda will then be published with reference to the letter and the answers provided by the author.

Addenda is published if authors have omitted a significant information inadvertently during manuscript submission and would like to add this content to the article after publication. The information provided for addendum will undergo peer-review prior to editorial acceptance. Addendum publication is very rare and will be allowed by Editorial team only if the information is very much essential to understand a significant portion of the published article.

Article Retractions

Retractions are published in circumstances like, if the conclusions of a paper is found to be based on faulty logic or computation by new information made available after the paper has been published; if the paper is based on falsified or fabricated data, if plagiarized data has been published or if duplicate publications exist. The retractions are decided on a case by case basis by the editor in consultation with the authors and the reviewers of the article. A signed statement from the authors will be required to be submitted to the Editorial Office before an article can be retracted. Agreement of all authors of a paper is required before a retraction can be published. If some co-authors do not agree to the retraction of the article, the retraction will be published as decided by the editor, clearly identifying the dissenting co-authors. When a retraction is published it will be linked to the article being corrected and a link to the retractions page will also be placed on the article published earlier. On the webpages of the retracted article the bibliographic information will be retained on all the pages, however, the article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been retracted from the journal. The PDF version of the article will be retained to preserve the integrity of record, but will be marked to show that the article has been retracted. In cases of partial retractions, the retraction notice will be labeled as 'Partial Retraction' or 'Retraction in Part'.

Article Removal

In exceptional circumstances an article may be removed from the journal. This may happen if any legal issues arise or are expected to arise in context of the article, the distribution of the article is stopped by an court order, the contents of the article may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the article violates copyright of others, or if the article is found to be defamatory or infringing on other's legal rights. When an article is removed from the journal the bibliographic information and the PDF file will also be removed. The article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been removed from the journal and the reason for removal.

Article Replacement

If an article is found to contain false or inaccurate data which may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the authors of the original article may wish to retract the article and replace it with a corrected version. In this case, the article will be retracted, following the procedure of retraction of an article, with the difference that a link to the corrected re-published article will be placed on PDF versions of the paper and on the page with the retraction notice.

Information for Reviewers

Reviewers should give estimates of the scientific value of the work, together with some basis for their opinion. They should indicate whether the writing is clear, concise, and relevant. Personal comments should be avoided. Reviewers should realize that their reports may be transmitted by the authors to editors of other ACS journals.

Funding Compliance

Authors are required to report funding sources and grant/award numbers. Enter ALL sources of funding for ALL authors in BOTH the FundRef tool in ACS Paragon Plus and in the manuscript to meet this requirement.

Funder Reporting Requirement

To help authors comply with the reporting requirements of one or more funders, we have provided the information below. It covers acknowledging funders, a selected list of funders' open access policies, and details of any arrangements with the ACS.

As a scholarly society deeply concerned with the integrity of the scientific record, the American Chemical Society (ACS) fully supports the broad and sustainable dissemination of the authoritative record of science found in our journals.

Additional ACS resources regarding open access: ACS' 3-step workflow: A guide to help authors understand ACS' open access options.

Authors are required to report funding sources and grant/award numbers relevant to each manuscript.Please enter ALL sources of funding for ALL authors relevant to the manuscript in BOTH the Open Funder Registry tool in ACS Paragon Plus and in your manuscript to meet this requirement.

Liên kết Website

Viện Kỹ thuật Hóa họcHội hóa học Việt NamTập đoàn Dầu khí Quốc gia Việt NamHội đồng chức danh Giáo sư Nhà nướcAmerican Chemical SocietyScienceDirectSpringerWiley Online LibraryOlympic Hóa học sinh viên Toàn quốc 2018